• OpenAccess
    • List of Articles فلسفه

      • Open Access Article

        1 - A Comparative Study of Practical Faculty and Emotional Intelligence
        Najaf  Yazdani Ruhollah  Razini
        A theme which is commonly discussed in philosophical psychology and modern psychology is attaining the knowledge of the various dimensions of human existence through different methods. One of these dimensions is the non-cognitive dimension of human beings, which has bee More
        A theme which is commonly discussed in philosophical psychology and modern psychology is attaining the knowledge of the various dimensions of human existence through different methods. One of these dimensions is the non-cognitive dimension of human beings, which has been mentioned in philosophical psychology in the discussion of practical faculty. Today, it has attracted the attention of psychologists under the title of emotional intelligence (EI) or emotional quotient (EQ). Some philosophers advocate a cognitive approach and some a non-cognitive one to this faculty. Still, some of them basically deny the existence of an independent practical faculty. Among the interpretations provided for Man’s practical faculty, the non-cognitive interpretation seems to be the correct one. In psychology, too, some capacity-based, non-cognitive, and competency-based models have been developed for EQ. From among them, the second and third models are more consistent with the selected interpretation of practical faculty in philosophy. The non-cognitive dimensions of human beings affect many human acts, and even their epistemological dimensions are sometimes influenced by their non-ideological aspects. Therefore, it is of great importance to study modern psychologists’ views of EQ and compare them with old psychological discussions of practical faculty. By comparing the views regarding this dimension in the two realms of modern psychology and philosophical psychology, this paper demonstrates that one of the important dimensions of Man’s development is the non-cognitive one, attaining a thorough knowledge of which can provide us with a more complete knowledge of human beings. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - سرمقاله
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
      • Open Access Article

        3 - The Borderline between Gnosis and its Homogeneous Sciences
        Ali  Shirvani
        Gnosis is a familiar term which is frequently used in oral and written culture and has a wide range of meanings. This has resulted in some ambiguity in its various applications, particularly, in its recent usage including “pseudo-gnosis” and “newly developed schools of More
        Gnosis is a familiar term which is frequently used in oral and written culture and has a wide range of meanings. This has resulted in some ambiguity in its various applications, particularly, in its recent usage including “pseudo-gnosis” and “newly developed schools of gnosis”, as well as in discussions such as “the relationship between religion and gnosis”, “the relationship between the intellect and gnosis”, and “the relationship between philosophy and gnosis”. This paper is intended to determine the approximate borderline between gnosis (the science of theoretical gnosis) and philosophy as well as the difference between gnosis (the science of practical gnosis) and ethics through clarifying the meaning and concept of gnosis, distinguishing between practical and theoretical types of wisdom, and explaining the differences between them and the sciences of practical and theoretical types of gnosis. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - سرمقاله
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
      • Open Access Article

        5 - سرمقاله
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
      • Open Access Article

        6 - Wisdom; The Lost Commodity of Contemporary Man
        Tuba  Kermani Habib Karkon  Karkon
        Although the terms “philosophy” and “wisdom” are usually used interchangeably, this paper aims to demonstrate that in Islamic philosophy wisdom has a more elevated meaning than philosophy. Based on the definition of wisdom, it deals with concepts such as knowledge of Go More
        Although the terms “philosophy” and “wisdom” are usually used interchangeably, this paper aims to demonstrate that in Islamic philosophy wisdom has a more elevated meaning than philosophy. Based on the definition of wisdom, it deals with concepts such as knowledge of God, assimilation to God, and perfection of the human soul. Thus wisdom bears a close relationship with the behavior of a sage (hakim) and is in conformity with his faith and act. As the life of Muslim sages testifies, unlike a philosopher in the common sense of the word, a hakim’s end is to change into a rational world. Clearly, in the contemporary world, in which most schools of philosophy emphasize skepticism and relativism, one cannot speak of wisdom but can talk about various philosophies. Recent schools of philosophies, more than leading Man towards certainty, keep them far away from it and abandon them in an ocean of doubtful thoughts. Accordingly, wisdom is the lost commodity of all the human beings who seek for certainty. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        7 - Mulla Sadra’s View of Philosophy
        Mansure  Rahmani Ahad Faramarz Gharamaleki Faramarz Gharamaleki
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philo More
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philosophy reflects the process of the perfection of the human soul in an essential and graded sense in the light of ontological wayfaring rather than in a quantitative or qualitative sense. He maintains that the end of philosophy is to become similar to God, and this similarity is realized through attaining all-inclusive knowledge and becoming separate from corporeal things. Assuming the sameness of philosophy and wayfaring results in pluralism in philosophizing, limitless philosophizing, separation of epistemological promotion from ontological promotion, methodological pluralism, and go togetherness of the purification of the soul and philosophy. Based on equating philosophy with wayfaring, Mulla Sadra tries to organize the structure of the Transcendent Philosophy based on the model of the four-fold journeys. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        8 - Mulla Sadra’s View of Philosophy
        Mansure  Rahmani Ahad Faramarz Gharamaleki Faramarz Gharamaleki Ghasim  Kakaie
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philo More
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philosophy reflects the process of the perfection of the human soul in an essential and graded sense in the light of ontological wayfaring rather than in a quantitative or qualitative sense. He maintains that the end of philosophy is to become similar to God, and this similarity is realized through attaining all-inclusive knowledge and becoming separate from corporeal things. Assuming the sameness of philosophy and wayfaring results in pluralism in philosophizing, limitless philosophizing, separation of epistemological promotion from ontological promotion, methodological pluralism, and go togetherness of the purification of the soul and philosophy. Based on equating philosophy with wayfaring, Mulla Sadra tries to organize the structure of the Transcendent Philosophy based on the model of the four-fold journeys. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        9 - Mulla Sadra’s View of Philosophy
        Mansure  Rahmani Ahad Faramarz Gharamaleki Faramarz Gharamaleki Ghasim  Kakaie
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philo More
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philosophy reflects the process of the perfection of the human soul in an essential and graded sense in the light of ontological wayfaring rather than in a quantitative or qualitative sense. He maintains that the end of philosophy is to become similar to God, and this similarity is realized through attaining all-inclusive knowledge and becoming separate from corporeal things. Assuming the sameness of philosophy and wayfaring results in pluralism in philosophizing, limitless philosophizing, separation of epistemological promotion from ontological promotion, methodological pluralism, and go togetherness of the purification of the soul and philosophy. Based on equating philosophy with wayfaring, Mulla Sadra tries to organize the structure of the Transcendent Philosophy based on the model of the four-fold journeys. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        10 - انگارة‌ ملاصدرا از فلسفه‌
        Mansure  Rahmani Ahad Faramarz Gharamaleki Faramarz Gharamaleki Ghasim  Kakaie
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philo More
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philosophy reflects the process of the perfection of the human soul in an essential and graded sense in the light of ontological wayfaring rather than in a quantitative or qualitative sense. He maintains that the end of philosophy is to become similar to God, and this similarity is realized through attaining all-inclusive knowledge and becoming separate from corporeal things. Assuming the sameness of philosophy and wayfaring results in pluralism in philosophizing, limitless philosophizing, separation of epistemological promotion from ontological promotion, methodological pluralism, and go togetherness of the purification of the soul and philosophy. Based on equating philosophy with wayfaring, Mulla Sadra tries to organize the structure of the Transcendent Philosophy based on the model of the four-fold journeys. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        11 - انگارة‌ ملاصدرا از فلسفه‌
        Mansure  Rahmani Ahad Faramarz Gharamaleki Faramarz Gharamaleki Ghasim  Kakaie
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philo More
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philosophy reflects the process of the perfection of the human soul in an essential and graded sense in the light of ontological wayfaring rather than in a quantitative or qualitative sense. He maintains that the end of philosophy is to become similar to God, and this similarity is realized through attaining all-inclusive knowledge and becoming separate from corporeal things. Assuming the sameness of philosophy and wayfaring results in pluralism in philosophizing, limitless philosophizing, separation of epistemological promotion from ontological promotion, methodological pluralism, and go togetherness of the purification of the soul and philosophy. Based on equating philosophy with wayfaring, Mulla Sadra tries to organize the structure of the Transcendent Philosophy based on the model of the four-fold journeys. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        12 - انگارة‌ ملاصدرا از فلسفه‌
        Mansure  Rahmani
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philo More
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philosophy reflects the process of the perfection of the human soul in an essential and graded sense in the light of ontological wayfaring rather than in a quantitative or qualitative sense. He maintains that the end of philosophy is to become similar to God, and this similarity is realized through attaining all-inclusive knowledge and becoming separate from corporeal things. Assuming the sameness of philosophy and wayfaring results in pluralism in philosophizing, limitless philosophizing, separation of epistemological promotion from ontological promotion, methodological pluralism, and go togetherness of the purification of the soul and philosophy. Based on equating philosophy with wayfaring, Mulla Sadra tries to organize the structure of the Transcendent Philosophy based on the model of the four-fold journeys. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        13 - Mulla Sadra’s View of Philosophy
        Mansure  Rahmani Ahad Faramarz Gharamaleki Faramarz Gharamaleki Ghasim  Kakaie
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philo More
        In the view of some philosophers, philosophy has been reduced to mental wayfaring and conceptual exchanges. In contrast, based on certain practical aspects, some other philosophers consider philosophy to be the same as ontological wayfaring. In Mulla Sadra’s view, philosophy reflects the process of the perfection of the human soul in an essential and graded sense in the light of ontological wayfaring rather than in a quantitative or qualitative sense. He maintains that the end of philosophy is to become similar to God, and this similarity is realized through attaining all-inclusive knowledge and becoming separate from corporeal things. Assuming the sameness of philosophy and wayfaring results in pluralism in philosophizing, limitless philosophizing, separation of epistemological promotion from ontological promotion, methodological pluralism, and go togetherness of the purification of the soul and philosophy. Based on equating philosophy with wayfaring, Mulla Sadra tries to organize the structure of the Transcendent Philosophy based on the model of the four-fold journeys. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        14 - Forewodr
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
        Aashoura Imam Hosein Philosophy of History
        Aashoura Imam Hosein Philosophy of History Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        15 - 22th congress on Mulla Sadra
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
        Mulla Sadra 22th Congress
        Mulla Sadra 22th Congress Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        16 - Foreword
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
        Arbaein Imam Hosein philosophy of history
        Arbaein Imam Hosein philosophy of history Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        17 - What is Metaphysics?
        Reza  Dawari Ardakani
        Aristotle’s Metaphysics is perhaps the most fundamental work in the field of philosophy. The importance of this book is to the extent that it is now about 2000 years that its name is used to refer to first philosophy (philosophia prima) and theology. It is at least 1500 More
        Aristotle’s Metaphysics is perhaps the most fundamental work in the field of philosophy. The importance of this book is to the extent that it is now about 2000 years that its name is used to refer to first philosophy (philosophia prima) and theology. It is at least 1500 years that metaphysics is viewed as a science that discusses the basic principles, first causes, and subjects in particular sciences. Metaphysics, which was initially called first philosophy and universal science, consisted of two parts, one speaking of absolute existence and its essential accidents and the other discussing theology. Accordingly, the philosophers of the Islamic world called first philosophy or universal science theology and divided it into two parts: general affairs or theology in the general sense of the word, which discusses existence and its principles, causes, and accidents, and particular theology or theology in the particular sense of the word, which deals with problems related to oneness and attributes, names, and acts of the Almighty Necessary. Islamic philosophers were unanimous at least regarding the basic principles and many essential problems. However, in modern Western philosophy, metaphysical problems have developed a new form and, thus, different fields of philosophy have come into existence. The philosophers of the modern era, from the time of Descartes until now, have provided a definition for metaphysics which is apparently different from Aristotle’s. Instead of defining and describing this science, they have defined their own philosophy. The present paper aims to clarify the nature of metaphysics through a historical analysis of the subject of this scientific discipline. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        18 - Efficient Causality in the View of Islamic Mutikallimun and Philosophers
        Seyyed Sadra al-Din  Taheri
        Causality is at the center of several natural relationships which are studied in empirical sciences. Presently, it is the basis of the discovery of scientific laws. Moreover, the applications of different laws in various sciences, including all the laws related to indiv More
        Causality is at the center of several natural relationships which are studied in empirical sciences. Presently, it is the basis of the discovery of scientific laws. Moreover, the applications of different laws in various sciences, including all the laws related to individuals, societies, and other natural realms, in relation to fauna, flora, and minerals or inanimate things, have causality at their center. Here, the author has tried to examine the validity of the principle of causality from the viewpoints of two Islamic schools (Mu‘tazilah and Ash‘ariyyah) and two schools of Islamic philosophy (Peripatetic and Transcendent – from Ibn Sīnā to ‘Allāmah Ṭabāṭabā’ī). This paper consist consists of an Introduction, three detailed reports, a summary of findings, and a conclusion. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        19 - Philosophy and Art
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
        Philosophy and Art Philosophy of Art
        Philosophy and Art Philosophy of Art Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        20 - Editor's Note
        Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei
        اصل در انسانيت انسان، همان فرهنگ و انديشه» اوست و نهاد فرهنگ و معارف و اجزاء سازنده و پيراموني آن، همچون حكمت و علوم ديگر، در ميان بخشها و نهادهاي ديگر اجتماعي در حكم سنگ اصلي بناست، و همانگونه كه شخصيت و ارزش واقعي يك فرد را، نه با زر و ثروت و زور بلكه با سطح فرهنگ و ش More
        اصل در انسانيت انسان، همان فرهنگ و انديشه» اوست و نهاد فرهنگ و معارف و اجزاء سازنده و پيراموني آن، همچون حكمت و علوم ديگر، در ميان بخشها و نهادهاي ديگر اجتماعي در حكم سنگ اصلي بناست، و همانگونه كه شخصيت و ارزش واقعي يك فرد را، نه با زر و ثروت و زور بلكه با سطح فرهنگ و شكل انديشه ـ و سپس دانش ـ او ميسنجند، ارزش واقعي جوامع متمدن و ملل نيز با فرهنگ و ارزشهاي ناشي از انديشة فلسفي و اخلاقي آنها ارزيابي ميشود. متأسفانه برغم فريادهايي كه دربارة زوال يا سير نزولي پژوهش و آفت علوم انساني و بويژه در بخش فلسفه و علوم عقلي در بيشتر محافل زده ميشود، همه ساله سهم اين حوزة مهم در بودجة كشور ناچيزتر ميگردد و فرياد عطش اين دشت كويرگونه و خشكسالي اين وادي تشنه، به گوش ملائكه موكّل بر آن نميرسد و تير دعاي باران اين جماعت فرهنگي و سربازان گمنام حكمت و دانش، به هدف اجابت نميخورد. فلسفه و حكمت در اين ميان ـ ‌يعني در ميان خانوادة فرهنگ و رشته‌هاي فراوان علم و فرزندخواندگان آن كه گاه بنام هنر، نسب خود را به فرهنگ ميرسانند‌ ـ از همه محرومتر و صداي آن از همه ضعيفتر و دست آن از همه كوتاهتر است. مقدار بودجه‌يي كه در كشور صرف تقويت و تغذية نهادهاي مربوط به آن ميشود، حتي كفاف حيات و جلوگيري از زوال آنها را نميدهد، چه رسد به رشد و ارتقاي آنها. دولت و بويژه مجلس شوراي اسلامي ـ‌كه ژرفتر و بي‌پيرايه‌تر به اهميت امور ميپردازد‌‌ـ بايد توجه داشته باشند كه: اولاً، در كنار علوم و فنون و هنرهاي وارداتي كه خزانه و امهات آن در غرب است، تنها فلسفه و علوم عقلي است كه سرماية تاريخي و ملّي ماست و دهها قرن در اين سرزمين باليده و شاخه‌هاي خود را به ملل همسايه فرستاده است و نقطة قوت و برتري ما در جهان در عرصة گفتگوي فرهنگها و مقايسة تاريخها و ملتها ميباشد. ثانياً، اگر سود و فايده را ملاك قرار دهيم و پاي مقايسه پيش آيد كه آيا فلسفه و حكمت و اخلاق براي جامعه مفيدتر است يا براي مثال موسيقي و فوتبال؟ مسلم است هرچه سود بيشتر برساند سزاوار سهم بيشتري است. اما بايد پرسيد كه آيا افراد جامعه با گذراندن وقت با اقسام هنر و ورزش، راه صحيح زيستن و خوشبخت زندگي كردن را مي‌آموزند يا با علوم عقلي كه پاسخگوي نيازها و پرسشهاي اصلي و فطري بشر ـ ‌از كودك تا بزرگسال ـ است؟ و كداميك بهتر ميتواند خط‌مشي درست براي كامروا و سعادتمند بودن را به وي بياموزد؟ و پيشگيري از جرم و جنايت و منع ارتكاب خلاف هنجارهاي اجتماعي و اخلاقي را ببار بياورد؟ ثالثاً، در صورتي كه همة اعضاي اين خانواده را در سودمندي برابر بدانيم، باز ملاك مهمتري در توزيع بودجة سالانه پيش روي ما قرار دارد كه بايستي معيار كار قرار گيرد؛ يعني بايد بررسي كرد كه فقدان كداميك از نهادهاي فعال جامعه، ضايعه ببار مي‌آورد و ضعف كدام بخش از بخشهاي مرزوق دولت و مجلس، ميتواند فرهنگ و استقلال فرهنگي ملت و كشور را به خطر بيندازد؟ بديهي است كه فقدان و نبود برخي از اقسام هنر و ورزش بهيچوجه ضايعه نيست و براي ملت و كشور هيچ خرابي‌يي ببار نمي‌آورد ـ اگر نگوييم كه برخي منافع محسوس هم دارد‌ ـ اما فقدان انديشه‌ها و روحهاي سالم در پناه منطق علمي و اخلاق و حكمت و اصول پرورشي، ميتواند ديگر اندامهاي اجتماع را نيز بيمار و عيبناك كند و به نهادهاي ديگر سياسي، اقتصادي، اجتماعي صدمه بزند و خط‌مشي سالم افراد جامعه را به سرگرداني در وادي از خودبيگانگي و جهل و نااميدي مبدل سازد يا مردمي مجرم و خاطي ببار آورد. اميدواريم ‌اكنون كه مرحله بررسي براي توزيع صحيح و عادلانه بودجه در دسترس نمايندگان مجلس شوراي اسلامي است، اين نكات مورد توجه قرار گيرد و حق نهاد مفيد و سازنده‌يي همچون حكمت متعالية اسلامي و علوم عقلي پيراموني آن با ترازوي انديشه و عدالت سنجيده و به آن برسد. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        21 - A Study of Specific Commonalities of Duties from Religious and Philosophical Perspectives: An Anthropological Approach
        Ali Asghar  Jafari Valani Habibeh  Molapanah
        This study investigates the problem of the possibility of similar duty from the viewpoints of religion and philosophy based on their anthropological principles. Since the problem of duty is tied to Man’s specific oneness and plurality, the study of religious and philoso More
        This study investigates the problem of the possibility of similar duty from the viewpoints of religion and philosophy based on their anthropological principles. Since the problem of duty is tied to Man’s specific oneness and plurality, the study of religious and philosophical views in this regard could open some new horizons before us. Although religious figures and most philosophers advocate the “specific oneness” of human beings, existentialists acknowledge their specific multiplicity. Therefore, religions and most philosophers practically agree with the sameness of duties; however, theoretically speaking, it can be said that Man’s specific plurality necessitates the existence of different duties. Hence, it seems that there might be certain inconsistencies such as the contrast between Mullā Ṣadrā’s theory of Man’s specific multiplicity and his practical commitment to the similarity of duties. Nevertheless, to resolve this inconsistency, one can refer to Man’s stability in spite of their trans-substantial motion and specific plurality. Another contrast pertains to the verses referring to the essential equality of human beings and those emphasizing the performance of duties within the limits of one’s capabilities. One can refer to the difference between the stages of making the duties and their being made. Manuscript profile